Among the features of a portable ultrasound, portability is one of the most important. Other features include speed, accuracy, and cost. But how can you choose between these factors? If you’re in the market for a portable ultrasound system, read on to find out more. Listed below are some of the most popular portable ultrasound systems on the market today. Whether you need to perform diagnostic ultrasound exams on the go or in the comfort of your own home, a portable ultrasound system can make your life easier.
Since the 1970s, portable ultrasound technology has evolved into ‘hand-held’ devices, which complement the clinical examination of non-radiologists. Its popularity has led to comparisons to modern stethoscopes. This Horizon Scanning Report will examine the role of portable ultrasound in primary care, with an emphasis on non-serious situations. While the field of ultrasound has also expanded to include imaging of the heart, portable technology is particularly applicable to primary care settings.
In a recent systematic review, Rudolph et al. reviewed six-hundred and thirty-six manuscripts in order to assess the impact of portable ultrasound. They found that the use of portable ultrasound may positively impact diagnosis, referral, and treatment. Moreover, there was no evidence of harm from portable ultrasound. This finding is consistent with the results of Becker’s 2016 systematic review published in the journal Tropical Medicine and International Health.
The Vscan Air is a portable ultrasound device distributed by GE Healthcare. This handheld ultrasound system features a dual-touch screen and is designed for use in hostile medical environments, including Emergency Medical Services, Trauma Centers, and Humanitarian Relief Operations. The device’s sleek design allows for a pocket-sized design, a simpler UI, and the ability to store auto-anonymized images. Despite its small size, portable ultrasound systems are still expensive.
In the field, portable ultrasound is the Swiss army knife of medical technology. With this versatile device, medical students can experience real-time imaging. Students can bring textbooks to life by seeing how anatomical structures look in real-time. Emergency room physicians are also early adopters of portable ultrasound. In addition to enabling medical professionals to see their patients in real time, ultrasounds can engage patients. Listed below are some reasons why portable ultrasounds are an invaluable tool.
While a high-end console-style ultrasound machine can be used to assess strains, a portable ultrasound cannot call on dedicated hardware. Instead, it relies on a wireless mobile device or a laptop computer. The processing power of these devices is not comparable to that of dedicated hardware. Furthermore, it is impossible to guarantee consistent data transfer rates with a wireless connection. However, portable ultrasound does not have the requisite computing power for this.
The speed of portable ultrasound machines varies greatly. Earlier, portable ultrasound machines were only multi-frequency (four to 13 MHz), but now they have a linear probe that can operate at a higher frequency. A high-end portable ultrasound is also more powerful. With the right features, it can provide excellent images. For example, the SonoSite iVIZ ultrasound has a 7.1-inch touch screen and offers a range of image settings.
Portable ultrasound is an important tool that physicians can use to assess varicose veins. A study by Bradbury et al evaluated the accuracy of hand-held ultrasound after primary repair of varicose veins. In that study, a consecutive series of 118 patients with recurrent varicose veins was assessed. The researchers used hand-held Doppler ultrasound to determine the level of vascularity and assess the accuracy of a clinical examination.
The accuracy of portable ultrasound was compared to that of stationary ultrasonography. The accuracy of the first ultrasound was highest when the bladder volume was less than 50 mL. It was the worst when the bladder was larger than 150 mL. Another study found that there was a low correlation between the two ultrasound methods. In addition, the accuracy of the second method decreased as the bladder was smaller in size. Despite these problems, catheterization remains the most accurate method of bladder volume estimation.
Portable ultrasound machines are battery-powered and produce color images. Some models even allow for image transfer. Accuracy depends on the resolution and frequency of soundwaves. Newer portable ultrasound devices offer the same resolution as console units, but the screens on portable ultrasound devices are often smaller. Therefore, physicians should know exactly what they can expect from portable ultrasound devices. The following are some advantages and disadvantages of portable ultrasound devices:
The global portable ultrasound device market is anticipated to reach USD 4.0 billion by 2020. The rising incidence of illness and the need for more advanced diagnostic methods are factors that will drive the portable ultrasound market. Leading manufacturers include Toshiba Corporation, Siemens AG, General Electric Company, Hitachi Ltd., and Mindray Medical International Ltd., among others. Although the market is expected to grow quickly, many challenges will hamper its growth. Listed below are some of the major challenges facing the portable ultrasound market.
The price of a portable ultrasound machine depends on several factors, including size, performance, and manufacturer. The top-of-the-line models tend to be the most expensive, but not every medical practice needs them. If a small medical practice does not require the most sophisticated technology, a less expensive portable ultrasound may be enough. The size and weight of portable ultrasound devices also determine their capability. Choosing the right unit for your practice is essential, as size dictates its capabilities.
The region that dominates the market for portable ultrasound devices is North America. This is primarily due to the region’s developed healthcare infrastructure. Additionally, the growing prevalence of disease and infection rates are driving growth in North America. In addition, a rising number of regional manufacturers are increasing the market’s potential. Furthermore, Canada is projected to grow rapidly in the region. Therefore, it’s important to understand the cost of portable ultrasound devices before making a purchase.
There is no definitive evidence regarding the reliability of a portable ultrasound. Although it shows a good correlation with VFSS for hyoid excursion, more study is needed to determine its validity. In general, however, reliability is high. In this study, we observed a good correlation between the ultrasound images and VFSS in the healthy and dysphagic participants. However, the reliability of this portable ultrasound device in determining hyoid excursion may be affected by pressure and lighting conditions of the clinical environment. We also noticed variance in patient performance, examiner technique, and the underlying cause of hyoid excursion.
Reliability of portable ultrasound for bladder volume assessment is currently under investigation in clinical settings. A preliminary study evaluated the accuracy of ultrasound images taken with an iPad against the gold standard of VFSS. This work is still in its preliminary stages, but it is important to note that there are significant limitations. Portable ultrasound is not appropriate for every clinical setting and requires further study before it can be widely adopted. We hope to see more studies that evaluate the performance of portable ultrasound for bladder volume assessment in a clinical setting.
Challenges of integrating portable ultrasound into emergency department workflow
The introduction of portable ultrasound devices into emergency departments is making imaging more convenient and efficient. The technology enables physicians to acquire, interpret, and integrate ultrasound images at the bedside. The use of portable ultrasound devices reduces the need for referring physicians, freeing up time for critical care. However, the technology does pose a number of challenges. Several of the challenges include billing and credentialing issues.
The integration of POCUS is often complicated by workflow issues. POCUS peripheral IV placement has been traditionally performed on larger ultrasound machines. HHU devices can eliminate the need for such staff and allow the emergency department to use more complex POCUS studies. However, HHU devices may not be appropriate for all POCUS studies. Therefore, the emergency department should be aware of the following challenges associated with the use of portable ultrasound in emergency departments.
Improving the use of POCUS in the emergency department has several potential benefits. POCUS is increasingly useful in the emergency department workflow, and a well-designed system can enhance patient care. It reduces the number of referrals to the emergency department, and its integration can extend the physical examination time. It also improves patient care by reducing the need for an echo lab. The resulting benefits can be enormous.